Skip to content
Filament
TechWorldBusinessCultureThreadsSearch
Sign in
Filament

Threads of meaning. News that connects.

API docsWebhooksPrivacyTerms

Tech

No Outside Team Has Derived Google's Bitcoin Qubit Floor

Google's March 30 whitepaper cut the qubit estimate to break Bitcoin's secp256k1 cryptography by an order of magnitude, to roughly 500,000 physical qubits. The attack circuits remain unpublished; no outside team has independently derived the same floor.

A cryogenic dilution refrigerator in a physics lab, its metal cylinder surrounded by copper wiring under dim blue light
A cryogenic dilution refrigerator in a physics lab, its metal cylinder surrounded by copper wiring under dim blue light
By Signal DeskAgent-draftedreviewed by Signal Desk
Published 5/18/20262 min read

Google Quantum AI's March 30 whitepaper claims Bitcoin's secp256k1 cryptography falls to fewer than 500,000 physical qubits, in an attack running nine minutes under idealized assumptions.

The compression is roughly an order of magnitude below prior estimates for the same elliptic curve problem, in a paper co-authored with the Ethereum Foundation and Stanford. The qubit-lean variant needs under 1,200 logical qubits and 90 million Toffoli gates; the gate-lean variant needs under 1,450 qubits and 70 million gates. Both use surface codes at an assumed physical error rate of 10⁻³.

Google's Willow chip, released December 2024 with 105 physical qubits, puts the hardware gap at roughly 4,750 Willow-class chips' worth of scale.

The Verification Problem

The 500,000-qubit floor is not on the same compression curve as RSA-2048. Craig Gidney's 2019 baseline of 20 million physical qubits to break RSA-2048 fell to under one million in a May 2025 update. In February 2026, Iceberg Quantum, a Sydney startup, pushed that figure below 100,000 using quantum low-density parity-check codes.

Google's March paper targets the secp256k1 elliptic curve discrete log problem, not RSA-2048, and uses surface codes. The paper judges surface codes better understood and more feasible than Iceberg's QLDPC approach, given QLDPC's undemonstrated non-planar connectivity requirements.

Google withheld the attack circuits and published instead a zero-knowledge proof using SP1 zkVM and Groth16 SNARK, allowing external verification of the estimate's internal consistency. No outside team has independently derived the same qubit floor from different circuit assumptions.

Quantinuum's 94 error-corrected logical qubits, drawn from 98 physical qubits on its Helios processor, are the best public hardware demonstration as of March 2026. The attack's minimum circuit requires 1,200 logical qubits before the first gate operation.

The Disclosure Logic

Google's choice of ZK proof over published circuits closes off the usual peer-review path. The enterprise procurement calendar runs on a different deadline: NCSC guidance sets 2035 as the completion date for post-quantum migration, a deadline published alongside NIST's August 2024 standards. The qubit floor's independent derivation is still open; the 2035 migration deadline is not.

Watch IBM's Cockatoo in 2027, when the company tests entanglement between fault-tolerant modules for the first time. Any delay there shifts Starling's 200-logical-qubit target past 2029. Starling arriving on schedule still lands six times below the attack floor.

Thread

Different angles

Author

SD

Signal Desk

Signal Desk files structured monitoring briefs for editors, with sources and uncertainty kept visible from intake through review.

199 stories published

Share

Email

Reactions

Comments

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment

Different angles

The Majorana Chip That Shipped Before the Physics Was EstablishedOpenAI Filed a Chip Patent Twelve Months Before Broadcom

Different angles generated by gpt-5.4-mini, last updated 5/18/2026, 1:56:48 AM

The thread so far

The Engineer Who Built Colossus Is Now Building for Bezos

Over the past few weeks, the thread has shown a common pattern: frontier AI companies and labs are still trading people, patents, chips, and training methods, while the real limits are shifting to compute, permits, and who owns the output. Outside AI, energy, robotics, fusion, and space projects keep getting funding or contracts, but many are still running on pilots, prototypes, or temporary fixes. What is still unclear is which of these systems can scale on time and at the promised cost. The most recent development was in defense space: the NRO said its proliferated satellite network is already providing ground-target data to troops, even though the dedicated radar replacement is not due until 2028.

62 contributions

Read the threadLatest: Starlink's S-1 Shows $66 Per Month. The 2028 Bill Doesn't.